Visual Movements
Pop & the Counter-Reactions · 18 of 49· 10 min read

Pop Art

1956 – 1972

High art ceases to despise the supermarket.

POW!commercial · pop
Ben-Day dots · the comic page · mass culture

A composition in the tradition's vocabulary.

In 1956, in the lobby of the Whitechapel Gallery in London, a small show called This Is Tomorrow opened. Among its exhibits was a tiny collage by the British artist Richard Hamilton, made with magazine cuttings: a bodybuilder posing in a 1950s living room, a half-dressed pin-up on a couch, a giant Tootsie Pop, a vacuum cleaner, a tape recorder, a tinned ham labelled "HAM," and on the wall in the background, a framed cover of Young Romance comics. The work was titled Just What Is It That Makes Today's Homes So Different, So Appealing? It is now generally considered the first Pop Art image — the moment when a serious artist looked at the visual landscape of postwar consumer capitalism, refused to be appalled by it, and decided it could be material.

Pop Art was a movement on two continents simultaneously, with different temperaments. The British version, centered on the Independent Group at the ICA in London — Hamilton, Eduardo Paolozzi, the critic Lawrence Alloway (who coined the term "Pop Art" in 1955) — was more intellectual, more critical, more interested in the anthropology of mass culture. American Pop, which emerged a few years later in New York, was more deadpan, more visually direct, and more economically successful: Andy Warhol, Roy Lichtenstein, Claes Oldenburg, James Rosenquist, Tom Wesselmann, and a few years later Robert Indiana and Ed Ruscha.

Warhol is the central figure. A successful commercial illustrator in the 1950s, he made the leap to fine art around 1960 with paintings of Campbell's soup cans, Coca-Cola bottles, Brillo boxes — products taken directly from the supermarket shelf and rendered, with deliberate flatness and minimal alteration, on canvas. His silkscreen technique, developed from 1962, allowed him to reproduce images from photographs and magazine sources with a mechanical sameness that abolished the visible "hand of the artist" that Abstract Expressionism had made central. He produced silkscreen portraits of Marilyn Monroe (begun the week after her death in 1962), of Elvis, of Jackie Kennedy, of soup cans. The Factory, his studio, became a public performance — a space where art-making, celebrity, and commerce were openly inseparable. Warhol famously said: "In the future, everyone will be world-famous for fifteen minutes." He understood, before almost anyone, that fame and image had become the central currencies of postwar Western culture.

Lichtenstein's contribution was different and equally significant. He painted enormous, immaculately rendered enlargements of single panels from romance and war comics — a tearful woman ("I don't care! I'd rather sink than call Brad for help!"), a fighter pilot firing his guns ("WHAAM!"), all rendered with mechanical precision: the black outlines, the flat unmodulated colors, the Ben-Day dots of the printing process all transferred faithfully to the canvas. The implicit argument was philosophical. The pretentious, serious tradition of Western painting had ignored, mocked, or actively despised the commercial-graphic tradition of comics and pulp magazines. Lichtenstein simply asserted that the comic-page tradition was as visually sophisticated as anything in fine art — that the Ben-Day dot was as legitimate a pictorial element as the painted glaze.

The movement's broader argument was that the cultural hierarchy between "high" art (gallery painting, classical music, literary fiction) and "low" art (advertising, commercial illustration, comics, popular music) was a snobbery rather than a discovery. Pop did not democratize high culture by bringing it down; it democratized it by going up — by treating commercial imagery as worthy of the same attention, the same scale, the same gallery walls as Old Master painting. Once this collapse happened, it never reversed. Almost all subsequent visual culture — postmodernism in design, music video as art form, the gallery careers of street artists, the contemporary Instagram-aesthetic of fine artists — depends on the principle that there is no longer a meaningful hierarchy between visual registers. Everything is material.

For design, the Pop legacy is everywhere and continuous. Editorial design after 1965 freely combined photographic, illustrative, and typographic elements without anxiety about register. Album cover art (Peter Blake's Sgt. Pepper's, 1967, is essentially a Pop Art collage on a record sleeve) became one of the dominant graphic forms of late twentieth-century visual culture. Brand identity work — Wolff Olins, Pentagram, the rise of "branding" as a design specialism — operates entirely within a Pop framework where commercial imagery is design's natural material. Contemporary Instagram aesthetics, contemporary memes-as-design, contemporary AI image generation, contemporary internet culture in general — they are all unimaginable without the moment, in the 1960s, when serious painters decided that supermarket packaging and movie stars and comic books were worth their attention.